From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Be more verbose when checkout takes a long time
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:20:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7v8x1b1fiu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802231323590.21332@woody.linux-foundation.org> (Linus Torvalds's message of "Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:36:08 -0800 (PST)")
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> So I find it irritating when git thinks for a long time without telling me
> what's taking so long. And by "long time" I definitely mean less than two
> seconds, which is already way too long for me.
Do you mean more than two or less than two?
> Now, git read-tree already had support for the "-v" flag that does nice
> updates about what's going on, but it was delayed by two seconds, and if
> the thing had already done more than half by then it would be quiet even
> after that, so in practice it meant that we migth be quiet for up to four
> seconds. Much too long.
Geez you are impatient ;-).
The other user of start_progress_delay uses 95% as cutoff. and
probably 50% was too low, but that may just be bikeshedding.
> ... Quite frankly, I'm not really sure why it disabled
> error messages in the first place: ...
> ...
> Now, I'm sure this had a good reason (for the "git checkout -m" case), but
> it did make the common case of git-checkout really annoying.
I agree. Perhaps we can add some message when "-m" codepath
falls back to the three-way merge to make "merge-error" less
scary. Perhaps like:
git-checkout.sh | 11 +++++++----
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/git-checkout.sh b/git-checkout.sh
index bd74d70..5e36136 100755
--- a/git-checkout.sh
+++ b/git-checkout.sh
@@ -210,11 +210,14 @@ then
git read-tree $v --reset -u $new
else
git update-index --refresh >/dev/null
- merge_error=$(git read-tree -m -u --exclude-per-directory=.gitignore $old $new 2>&1) || (
- case "$merge" in
- '')
- echo >&2 "$merge_error"
+ git read-tree -$v m -u --exclude-per-directory=.gitignore $old $new || (
+ case "$merge,$v" in
+ ,*)
exit 1 ;;
+ 1,)
+ ;; # quiet
+ *)
+ echo >&2 "Falling back to 3-way merge..." ;;
esac
# Match the index to the working tree, and do a three-way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-23 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-23 21:36 Be more verbose when checkout takes a long time Linus Torvalds
2008-02-23 22:20 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-02-23 22:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-23 22:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-23 23:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-23 23:45 ` [PATCH] checkout: error out when index is unmerged even with -m Junio C Hamano
2008-02-24 6:29 ` Daniel Barkalow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7v8x1b1fiu.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).