From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] git status: show relative paths when run in a subdirectory Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:26:16 -0800 Message-ID: <7v8x593zyv.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <9e4733910711071415i1729e277u6be19b72cd682a85@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910711071445p7cfb6cffx83adb1d84d6bf9d8@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910711071503va92a653s25fd978989d5917d@mail.gmail.com> <243E1E6E-4723-42D3-933C-D2A0D1ACE287@silverinsanity.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Symonds , Brian Gernhardt , Jon Smirl , Git Mailing List , gitster@pobox.com To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 08 09:26:50 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iq2io-000208-Op for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:26:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753539AbXKHI00 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 03:26:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752540AbXKHI00 (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 03:26:26 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:39878 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751419AbXKHI0Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Nov 2007 03:26:25 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AB22EF; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 03:26:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4553592643; Thu, 8 Nov 2007 03:26:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:12:22 +0000 (GMT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > -static const char *quote_crlf(const char *in, char *buf, size_t sz) > +static const char *quote_crlf(const char *in, int len, char *buf, size_t sz, > + const char *prefix) > { This is not quote_*crlf* anymore. > @@ -118,8 +150,8 @@ static void wt_status_print_filepair(struct wt_status *s, > const char *one, *two; > char onebuf[PATH_MAX], twobuf[PATH_MAX]; > > - one = quote_crlf(p->one->path, onebuf, sizeof(onebuf)); > - two = quote_crlf(p->two->path, twobuf, sizeof(twobuf)); > + one = quote_crlf(p->one->path, -1, onebuf, sizeof(onebuf), s->prefix); > + two = quote_crlf(p->two->path, -1, twobuf, sizeof(twobuf), s->prefix); I wonder if it makes more sense to use strbuf here...