From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add ability to specify SMTP server port when using git-send-email. Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 23:24:33 -0700 Message-ID: <7v8x6v6z4u.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1190666058-10969-1-git-send-email-glenn@rempe.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Glenn Rempe X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Sep 25 08:24:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ia3qg-0005qr-CP for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:24:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751677AbXIYGYj (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:24:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751988AbXIYGYj (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:24:39 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:56839 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751521AbXIYGYi (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:24:38 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FFD13B716; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:24:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1190666058-10969-1-git-send-email-glenn@rempe.us> (Glenn Rempe's message of "Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:34:18 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Glenn Rempe writes: > git-send-email.perl | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- > 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/git-send-email.perl b/git-send-email.perl > index 4031e86..7c9c302 100755 > --- a/git-send-email.perl > +++ b/git-send-email.perl > @@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ Options: > --smtp-server If set, specifies the outgoing SMTP server to use. > Defaults to localhost. > > + --smtp-server-port If set, specifies the port on the outgoing SMTP > + server to use. Defaults to port 25 unless --smtp-ssl is set in > + which case it will default to port 465. > + This paragraph look inconsistent with different indentation for second and subsequent lines. > @@ -375,6 +381,14 @@ if (!defined $smtp_server) { > $smtp_server ||= 'localhost'; # could be 127.0.0.1, too... *shrug* > } > > +if (!defined $smtp_server_port) { > + if ($smtp_ssl) { > + $smtp_server_port = 465 # SSL port > + } else { > + $smtp_server_port = 25 # Non-SSL port > + } > +} > + > if ($compose) { > # Note that this does not need to be secure, but we will make a small > # effort to have it be unique > @@ -604,20 +618,32 @@ X-Mailer: git-send-email $gitversion > } else { > if ($smtp_ssl) { > require Net::SMTP::SSL; > - $smtp ||= Net::SMTP::SSL->new( $smtp_server, Port => 465 ); > + $smtp ||= Net::SMTP::SSL->new( $smtp_server, Port => $smtp_server_port ); > } > else { > require Net::SMTP; > - $smtp ||= Net::SMTP->new( $smtp_server ); > + $smtp ||= Net::SMTP->new( $smtp_server . ":" . $smtp_server_port ); > } This change suggests that, although undocumented, existing users could have already been using --smtp-server=smtp.myisp.com:26 to specify a nonstandard port, and this patch, while bringing in the support for a nonstandard port as an official feature, would break such a setup. I wonder how real the issue is, and if we can work it around easily. For example, (1) drop the "default to 25 for smtp if undefined" part we saw earlier; (2) redo this part as if ($smtp_ssl) { ... as you have it ... } else { require Net::SMTP; $smtp ||= Net::SMTP->new((defined $smtp_server_port) ? "$smtp_server:$smtp_server_port" : $smtp_server); } > - $smtp->auth( $smtp_authuser, $smtp_authpass ) > - or die $smtp->message if (defined $smtp_authuser); > ... > + > + # we'll get an ugly error if $smtp was undefined above. > + # If so we'll catch it and present something friendlier. > + if ($smtp) { > + > + if ((defined $smtp_authuser) && (defined $smtp_authpass)) { > + $smtp->auth( $smtp_authuser, $smtp_authpass ) or die $smtp->message; > + } > + ... > + } else { > + die "Unable to initialize SMTP properly. Is there something wrong with your config?"; > + } I'd prefer the check done the opposite order, like if (!$smtp) { die ... } without an else clause.