From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix passing of TCLTK_PATH to git-gui Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2007 01:44:43 -0700 Message-ID: <7v8xd7tdl0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <81b0412b0704050049u746842ebn270998c5732927d3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Git Mailing List" , "Eygene Ryabinkin" To: "Alex Riesen" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 05 10:44:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HZNaN-0002Fl-Sm for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 10:44:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964959AbXDEIop (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:44:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965030AbXDEIop (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:44:45 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao102.cox.net ([68.230.241.44]:60779 "EHLO fed1rmmtao102.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964959AbXDEIoo (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:44:44 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070405084444.MJNK28911.fed1rmmtao102.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 5 Apr 2007 04:44:44 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id jLkj1W00N1kojtg0000000; Thu, 05 Apr 2007 04:44:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <81b0412b0704050049u746842ebn270998c5732927d3@mail.gmail.com> (Alex Riesen's message of "Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:49:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Alex Riesen" writes: > Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen > --- > > GNU make does not include environment variables by default > in its namespace. Shouldn't this be part of proposed commit log message? Also I'd appreciate if you did not attach the format-patch output, but send a properly formatted e-mail. I would not be so picky to non-regulars, but I expect I'd be getting many more patches from you, so...