From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make git-branch a builtin Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:00:51 -0700 Message-ID: <7v8xj5ir7g.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <11616396262982-git-send-email-hjemli@gmail.com> <20061023215506.GB8344@spearce.org> <7vfydewqbb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061024054408.GA9724@spearce.org> <7vy7r6qkmg.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061024113924.GC20017@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Shawn Pearce , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 24 19:01:22 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcPeC-0002UF-MJ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 19:01:05 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030438AbWJXRAx (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:00:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030434AbWJXRAx (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:00:53 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.241.38]:5249 "EHLO fed1rmmtao01.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030438AbWJXRAw (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:00:52 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061024170052.GWFQ6077.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:00:52 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id eH0b1V00F1kojtg0000000 Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:00:35 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20061024113924.GC20017@pasky.or.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:39:24 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis writes: >> Think of a future when you can shallowly clone near the tip of >> git repository that does not have shell-script git-branch.sh >> anymore. You cannot expect to already have the preimage of the >> patch in such a case. You would still want to be able to revert >> the change with "git apply -R". > > Hmm, how is this argument not applying to binary diffs you can't revert > either? Earlier you cannot, but because now you can, perhaps? ;-)