From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Change set based shallow clone Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:42:53 -0700 Message-ID: <7v8xkrqlma.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <9e4733910609071923tf1c49f6o70419e961e9eb66f@mail.gmail.com> <20060908184215.31789.qmail@science.horizon.com> <9e4733910609081413p32456768g280bdc9b232d7902@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910609081628w2a59551foc28c689d0538a984@mail.gmail.com> <17668.2019.732961.855446@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <9e4733910609100756r1ece1e22m38054536a2909dd4@mail.gmail.com> <7v1wqjsgfx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060911000403.GB28927@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 11 02:42:23 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GMZsM-00071U-U2 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2006 02:42:15 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964855AbWIKAmK (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:42:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964858AbWIKAmK (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:42:10 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:942 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964855AbWIKAmJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:42:09 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060911004208.SAER2704.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:42:08 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id Lohz1V00D1kojtg0000000 Sun, 10 Sep 2006 20:41:59 -0400 To: Shawn Pearce User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Shawn Pearce writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> We could benefit from the suggested organization of one base >> archive pack plus a current active pack. The core side code to >> help doing so was posted here which followed a discussion on how >> to have repack make use of it last week. >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/26218/focus=26326 >> >> Any takers? > > I thought this was settled and you had it implemented? Is this > still an open topic? I've implemented the core side and I think it is ready. People who actually have need for such a repack are welcome to take a crack at it at the Porcelain-ish level.