From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: irc usage.. Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 15:39:16 -0700 Message-ID: <7v8xotadm3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <44713BE4.9040505@gentoo.org> <46a038f90605220042v369e9ff5o3dc7841472171d02@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90605220554y569c11b9p24027772bd2ee79a@mail.gmail.com> <44720C66.6040304@gentoo.org> <46a038f90605221241x58ffa2a4o26159d38d86a8092@mail.gmail.com> <20060522214128.GE16677@kiste.smurf.noris.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 23 00:39:37 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FiJ3d-0005pY-TL for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 23 May 2006 00:39:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751282AbWEVWjT (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 18:39:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751281AbWEVWjT (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 18:39:19 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:29598 "EHLO fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751282AbWEVWjR (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2006 18:39:17 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060522223917.MHAZ27919.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 22 May 2006 18:39:17 -0400 To: Matthias Urlichs In-Reply-To: <20060522214128.GE16677@kiste.smurf.noris.de> (Matthias Urlichs's message of "Mon, 22 May 2006 23:41:28 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Matthias Urlichs writes: > Hi, > > Linus Torvalds: >> I wonder why those "git-update-index" calls seem to be (assuming I read >> the perl correctly) done only a few files at a time. We can do a hundreds >> in one go, but it seems to want to do just ten files or something at the >> same time. > > No, fifty. > > I simply was too lazy to count the actual filenames' lengths. ;-) I think cvsimport predates that option, but these days that loop can be optimized by feeding --index-info from standard input.