From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [Census] So who uses git? Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:43:30 -0800 Message-ID: <7v8xsww2kt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <46a038f90601251810m1086d353ne8c7147edee4962a@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90601272133o53438987ka6b97c21d0cdf921@mail.gmail.com> <1138446030.9919.112.camel@evo.keithp.com> <7vzmlgt5zt.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <1138529385.9919.185.camel@evo.keithp.com> <43DCA495.9040301@gorzow.mm.pl> <20060129181240.GA11721@kroah.com> <43DFAD91.4080105@gorzow.mm.pl> <43DFBF9A.2020409@gorzow.mm.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Greg KH , Keith Packard , cworth@cworth.org, Martin Langhoff , Linus Torvalds , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 31 21:43:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F42Lg-0007gI-VS for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:43:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751472AbWAaUne (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:43:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751471AbWAaUne (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:43:34 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:37512 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751469AbWAaUnd (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:43:33 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060131204212.QXBC6244.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:42:12 -0500 To: Radoslaw Szkodzinski In-Reply-To: <43DFBF9A.2020409@gorzow.mm.pl> (Radoslaw Szkodzinski's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:50:50 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Radoslaw Szkodzinski writes: > Radoslaw Szkodzinski wrote: >> Cloning without -l option is much slower - some minutes vs below a minute. >> I could have time(8)d it, but it's no use. >> > > Make that time(1)d. > > Results for the kernel follow. Disc cache has been preheated with find. While you are at it, "git clone -l -s -n" might be more interesting.