From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Clean up compatibility definitions. Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 23:58:34 -0800 Message-ID: <7v8xuy64id.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <81b0412b0512050519k5ed80035x9eb4907f569e0a4b@mail.gmail.com> <81b0412b0512050524w7b632651n93c836fda41a39d@mail.gmail.com> <7vfyp7cuii.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7voe3vb8fh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vk6ejb72r.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20051205213929.GB4443@steel.home> <81b0412b0512052335i43da5d34xf2ef78e66e40c6ee@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Dec 06 08:59:41 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjXin-0004yz-R5 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 08:58:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932537AbVLFH6h (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 02:58:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932488AbVLFH6h (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 02:58:37 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:9919 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932489AbVLFH6g (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2005 02:58:36 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051206075721.ZTHW17006.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 6 Dec 2005 02:57:21 -0500 To: Alex Riesen In-Reply-To: <81b0412b0512052335i43da5d34xf2ef78e66e40c6ee@mail.gmail.com> (Alex Riesen's message of "Tue, 6 Dec 2005 08:35:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alex Riesen writes: > On 12/5/05, Alex Riesen wrote: >> Junio C Hamano, Mon, Dec 05, 2005 21:51:56 +0100: >> > >> This attempts to clean up the way various compatibility >> > >> functions are defined and used. >> > > >> > > You sure you want that before 1.0? >> > >> > I think this is mostly an obvious clean-up, but I do not have >> > enough test environments, so ... >> I will do cygwin. Tomorrow, that is. > > The patch works on cygwin. I let the tests run, too. Thanks. I've had a chance to try the one in the "master" branch on cygwin myself today and it seemed to work OK. I did a partial build on Solaris 5.9 as well.