From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Tell vim the textwidth is 75. Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 16:24:35 -0700 Message-ID: <7v8xzyh1ak.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20050721202309.8216.19338.stgit@h164.c77.b0.tor.eicat.ca> <7v3bq71rmb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050722204120.GD11916@pasky.ji.cz> <7vr7dqpmm4.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050722212725.GJ11916@pasky.ji.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Catalin Marinas , Bryan larsen , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 23 01:28:22 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dw6vz-0003Pm-U3 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 01:28:04 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262230AbVGVX1V (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:27:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262228AbVGVX1Q (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:27:16 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:59631 "EHLO fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262230AbVGVXYj (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:24:39 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050722232433.EMML550.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 19:24:33 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20050722212725.GJ11916@pasky.ji.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:27:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Petr Baudis writes: > Cogito shows '[NMD] filename' in place of @FILELIST@. Sounds sensible. Does it parse it to limit the files to be committed? > This brings me to another subject, M and N are pretty hard to > distinguish visually without close inspection of the output. What about > switching to use A instead of N everywhere? Although I admit that is minor, I've had the same problem, and this sounds like a good idea. However, I'd like to see what the extent of damage would be even if everybody agrees this is a good change. Any one of core barebone Porcelain, Linus git-tools, gitk, gitweb, Cogito, and StGIT would have a veto over this kind of change, or at least we should wait until everybody catches up. If we all decide to go ahead, the transition would not be so painful, since we do not currently say 'A', the Porcelains can start accepting 'A' as synonym for 'N' today, and then later we can change the tools to produce 'A' instead of 'N'.