From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not show empty diff in diff-cache uncached. Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 22:53:53 -0700 Message-ID: <7v8y1x9s3y.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vsm091887.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vk6lk5lxt.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v3bs82rwh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vis13wth4.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vis11n69l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v3bs5k8d1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 30 07:51:54 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DcdBS-0002IR-Hu for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2005 07:51:30 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261520AbVE3Fx4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2005 01:53:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261521AbVE3Fx4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2005 01:53:56 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:7815 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261520AbVE3Fxz (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 May 2005 01:53:55 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.60.172]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050530055354.EBPX26972.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 30 May 2005 01:53:54 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Sun, 29 May 2005 22:34:59 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "LT" == Linus Torvalds writes: LT> On Sun, 29 May 2005, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> Please disregard the patches you have already discarded so far; >> this request-to-discard includes -O and -B enhancements. LT> I actually like -B, it's just that that patch depended on -O and also came LT> with a separate patch that was the reason I liked -B in the first place.. Good. I actually just finished testing the complete reorder of the patches and about to start the final review before throwing the bundle at you again. In the new set, -B comes before -O.