From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Patch to support proxy authentication through NTLM? Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 18:34:05 -0800 Message-ID: <7vaa6kc8yq.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4CDEC141B5583D408E79F2931DB7708301691B80@GSX300A.mxchg.m.corp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: "Schmidt\, Marco" , git@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?B?w4Z2YXIgQXJuZmrDtnLDsA==?= Bjarmason X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 23 03:34:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rduxo-0000oM-34 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2011 03:34:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753586Ab1LWCeJ convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:34:09 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:52588 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752209Ab1LWCeI convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:34:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EB95878; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:34:07 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=Vz/rI1Ynmyqm 9wtdlwiRA4L/4pw=; b=BdgBcLuCteEcLGcQ0mOtL60hkc6BTfuchI0Ytg4E1OQC JNNNpCJwXJBZoioT9o0qcVbF7rDEAvc6hRwScAJerXdIcrwZ8LBI4nNlJjg4V1Fp lwrbcgVZL2qDDLHlNVa/6jrVtTOzltG2lq902ewa8Yt14m64IxlqJF0d4SONWUs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=VQrC4g i33x5yaVWGRiJFT+BPsCwfXcPl8cj8RLu4bPSmMhT/o24np7sQV0UcAfbcC10mV/ trokpz5S7aJneu146CR3s+ORg9A0jrRzI2+lNwd/Luctqwf9Yvn9kkx6gvo5Gem9 QMGRtlJLI0jK2kWD9gDff772uwLv3rYKt3WUo= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787805877; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:34:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E7FDE5876; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:34:06 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?IsOGdmFyIEFybmZqw7Zyw7A=?= Bjarmason"'s message of "Fri, 23 Dec 2011 02:43:13 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9624F360-2D0E-11E1-9644-9DB42E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: =C3=86var Arnfj=C3=B6r=C3=B0 Bjarmason writes: > Which means that if you're interested in it the best thing you can do > is to take that patch, rebase it on top of master, make sure it works= , > and re-submit it. In the case of that particular patch, it appears to take more than that= , unless you meant "make it work" by "make sure it works". The discussion following patch seems to indicate that it was very broken and not worki= ng at all, and then the patch submitter disappeared.