From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: "Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] Accept tags in HEAD or MERGE_HEAD
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 13:17:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vaab52m2r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313765407-29925-4-git-send-email-pclouds@gmail.com> ("Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy"'s message of "Fri, 19 Aug 2011 21:50:07 +0700")
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> writes:
> Junio's point, that if HEAD holds a tag, then head_sha1 and head->object.sha1
> in statement [1] are different, is entirely correct. However, favoring
> head->object.sha1 over head_sha1 is not enough. The variable head_sha1 is
> still there. Somewhere, some time, people may misuse it.
That is why I suggested _removing_ head_sha1[] altogether, so that there
is only one source of information. is_initial becomes !current_head and
head_sha1 becomes (current_head ? current_head->object.sha1 : null_sha1).
> diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
> index ac337c7..9e7f7ef 100644
> --- a/commit.c
> +++ b/commit.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,25 @@ struct commit *lookup_commit_reference(const unsigned char *sha1)
> return lookup_commit_reference_gently(sha1, 0);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Look sha1 up for a commit, defer if needed. If deference occurs,
> + * update "sha1" for consistency with retval->object.sha1. Also warn
> + * users this case because it is expected that sha1 points directly to
> + * a commit.
> + */
That's de-reference, not deference ;-). You may want to be more explicit
about what kind of de-reference you are talking about.
/*
* Get a commit object for the given sha1, unwrapping a tag object that
* point at a commit while at it. ref_name is only used when the result
* is not a commit in the error message to report where we got the sha1
* from.
*/
I actually was hoping that you would have this comment in commit.h to help
people who want to add callers of this function, not next to the
implementation.
As I said earlier, I do not think updating sha1[] here is necessary. The
caller should be updated to use c->object.sha1 instead.
> +struct commit *lookup_commit_or_die(unsigned char *sha1, const char *ref_name)
> +{
> + struct commit *c = lookup_commit_reference(sha1);
> + if (!c)
> + die(_("could not parse %s"), ref_name);
> + if (hashcmp(sha1, c->object.sha1)) {
> + warning(_("%s %s is not a commit!"),
> + ref_name, sha1_to_hex(sha1));
> + hashcpy(sha1, c->object.sha1);
> + }
> + return c;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-19 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-15 15:38 [PATCH] commit: check return value of lookup_commit() Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-08-15 17:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-16 13:22 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-08-16 18:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-17 1:32 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-08-17 1:42 ` [PATCH v2] commit: accept tag objects in HEAD/MERGE_HEAD Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-08-17 17:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-18 2:10 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-08-18 13:43 ` [PATCH v3] Accept tags in HEAD or MERGE_HEAD Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-08-18 18:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-19 12:53 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-08-19 14:50 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] commit: remove global variable head_sha1[] Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-08-19 14:50 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] merge: keep stash[] a local variable Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-08-19 22:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-19 14:50 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] merge: remove global variable head[] Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-08-23 18:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-08-19 14:50 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] Accept tags in HEAD or MERGE_HEAD Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
2011-08-19 20:17 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2011-08-20 16:37 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-08-19 18:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] commit: remove global variable head_sha1[] Junio C Hamano
2011-08-20 12:03 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vaab52m2r.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).