* Redoing a merge for a particular file @ 2011-07-07 22:24 Chris Packham 2011-07-07 22:41 ` Jeff King 2011-07-08 0:36 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Chris Packham @ 2011-07-07 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: GIT Hi All, I'm in the middle of merging to branches and I've screwed up my manual merge, I've also got rerere enabled and I can't seem to get back into a state to trigger git mergetool again. $ git merge topic ... $ git mergetool $ make error: foo.c ... oops screwed up that merge. The merge wasn't too painful so I don't mind starting again. $ git reset --hard HEAD^ HEAD is now at 59c6097 ... $ git merge topic Auto-merging foo.c CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in foo.c Auto-merging bar.c CONFLICT (content): bar.c Auto-merging otherfile1.c Auto-merging otherfile2.c Auto-merging otherfile3.c Resolved 'foo.c' using previous resolution. Resolved 'bar.c' using previous resolution. Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. $ git mergetool No files need merging So rerere has remembered the bad resolution of foo.c. But even if I run 'git rerere clear' and repeat the above sequence I get the same result. I seem to remember something like this coming up before. Wasn't there an option added to checkout to allow us to recreate the pre-merge state? $ git checkout --merge foo.c $ git mergetool No files need merging I can manually fix the error and amend the merge commit I just thought git should be able to give me some help. I could have sworn that checkout --merge is the right thing to do. Sure enough the man page says it is "When checking out paths from the index, this option lets you recreate the conflicted merge in the specified paths." maybe this is a bug? Looking at git status I think checkout is working as advertised but maybe the bug is with mergetool. $ git status # On branch master # Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 1 commit, and can be fast-forwarded. # # Changes to be committed: .... # Unmerged paths: # (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution) # # both modified: foo.c # foo.c now does have conflict markers in it so I think it's crying out to be re-merged I just can't convince mergetool to do it. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks, Chris P.S. $ git --version git version 1.7.5.4 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Redoing a merge for a particular file 2011-07-07 22:24 Redoing a merge for a particular file Chris Packham @ 2011-07-07 22:41 ` Jeff King 2011-07-07 23:31 ` Chris Packham 2011-07-08 0:36 ` Junio C Hamano 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Jeff King @ 2011-07-07 22:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Packham; +Cc: GIT On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:24:10AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote: > I'm in the middle of merging to branches and I've screwed up my manual > merge, I've also got rerere enabled and I can't seem to get back into > a state to trigger git mergetool again. > > $ git merge topic > ... > $ git mergetool > $ make > error: foo.c ... oops screwed up that merge. > > The merge wasn't too painful so I don't mind starting again. > > $ git reset --hard HEAD^ > HEAD is now at 59c6097 ... > $ git merge topic > Auto-merging foo.c > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in foo.c > Auto-merging bar.c > CONFLICT (content): bar.c > Auto-merging otherfile1.c > Auto-merging otherfile2.c > Auto-merging otherfile3.c > Resolved 'foo.c' using previous resolution. > Resolved 'bar.c' using previous resolution. > Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. > $ git mergetool > No files need merging > > So rerere has remembered the bad resolution of foo.c. But even if I > run 'git rerere clear' and repeat the above sequence I get the same > result. I think you actually want "rerere forget". Like: $ git reset --hard HEAD^ $ git merge topic $ git rerere forget foo.c Although it is slightly more complicated if you have set rerere.autoupdate, since it will have cleared the index of any notion that the path was conflicted. In that case you can then follow the "rerere forget" with: $ git reset --hard $ git merge topic to retry again. But it doesn't look like you have autoupdate on, from the output above (it would say "Staged 'foo.c'" instead of "Resolved 'foo.c", I believe). > I seem to remember something like this coming up before. > Wasn't there an option added to checkout to allow us to recreate the > pre-merge state? > > $ git checkout --merge foo.c > $ git mergetool > No files need merging If you have rerere.autoupdate on, then it will have updated the index, and the path will not appear unmerged. You can use the trick above to get past it. If you aren't using rerere.autoupdate (and haven't updated the index yourself), you shouldn't even need the "git checkout --merge" line. It just updates the working tree with the conflicted content, but mergetool will operate directly on the original versions contained in the index, anyway. > $ git status > # On branch master > # Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 1 commit, and can be > fast-forwarded. > # > # Changes to be committed: > .... > # Unmerged paths: > # (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution) > # > # both modified: foo.c > # > > foo.c now does have conflict markers in it so I think it's crying out > to be re-merged I just can't convince mergetool to do it. Am I doing > something wrong? Hmm. That does seem like "git checkout --merge" did the right thing, but that "mergetool" is wrong for not accepting it (it _should_ just be looking at what's in the index to find unmerged paths). Ahh. It is probably the fault of bb0a484 (mergetool: Skip autoresolved paths, 2010-08-17), which checks with rerere to avoid resolved paths. So I think: $ git rerere forget foo.c $ git mergetool would do what you want. -Peff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Redoing a merge for a particular file 2011-07-07 22:41 ` Jeff King @ 2011-07-07 23:31 ` Chris Packham 2011-07-08 0:37 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Chris Packham @ 2011-07-07 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jeff King; +Cc: GIT Peff sorry for the spam. I forgot to CC the list. On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:24:10AM +1200, Chris Packham wrote: > >> I'm in the middle of merging to branches and I've screwed up my manual >> merge, I've also got rerere enabled and I can't seem to get back into >> a state to trigger git mergetool again. >> >> $ git merge topic >> ... >> $ git mergetool >> $ make >> error: foo.c ... oops screwed up that merge. >> >> The merge wasn't too painful so I don't mind starting again. >> >> $ git reset --hard HEAD^ >> HEAD is now at 59c6097 ... >> $ git merge topic >> Auto-merging foo.c >> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in foo.c >> Auto-merging bar.c >> CONFLICT (content): bar.c >> Auto-merging otherfile1.c >> Auto-merging otherfile2.c >> Auto-merging otherfile3.c >> Resolved 'foo.c' using previous resolution. >> Resolved 'bar.c' using previous resolution. >> Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. >> $ git mergetool >> No files need merging >> >> So rerere has remembered the bad resolution of foo.c. But even if I >> run 'git rerere clear' and repeat the above sequence I get the same >> result. > > I think you actually want "rerere forget". Like: > > $ git reset --hard HEAD^ > $ git merge topic > $ git rerere forget foo.c > > Although it is slightly more complicated if you have set > rerere.autoupdate, since it will have cleared the index of any notion > that the path was conflicted. In that case you can then follow the > "rerere forget" with: > > $ git reset --hard > $ git merge topic > > to retry again. > > But it doesn't look like you have autoupdate on, from the output above > (it would say "Staged 'foo.c'" instead of "Resolved 'foo.c", I believe). > >> I seem to remember something like this coming up before. >> Wasn't there an option added to checkout to allow us to recreate the >> pre-merge state? >> >> $ git checkout --merge foo.c >> $ git mergetool >> No files need merging > > If you have rerere.autoupdate on, then it will have updated the index, > and the path will not appear unmerged. You can use the trick above to > get past it. > > If you aren't using rerere.autoupdate (and haven't updated the index > yourself), you shouldn't even need the "git checkout --merge" line. It > just updates the working tree with the conflicted content, but mergetool > will operate directly on the original versions contained in the index, > anyway. > >> $ git status >> # On branch master >> # Your branch is behind 'origin/master' by 1 commit, and can be >> fast-forwarded. >> # >> # Changes to be committed: >> .... >> # Unmerged paths: >> # (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution) >> # >> # both modified: foo.c >> # >> >> foo.c now does have conflict markers in it so I think it's crying out >> to be re-merged I just can't convince mergetool to do it. Am I doing >> something wrong? > > Hmm. That does seem like "git checkout --merge" did the right thing, but > that "mergetool" is wrong for not accepting it (it _should_ just be > looking at what's in the index to find unmerged paths). > > Ahh. It is probably the fault of bb0a484 (mergetool: Skip autoresolved > paths, 2010-08-17), which checks with rerere to avoid resolved paths. So > I think: > > $ git rerere forget foo.c > $ git mergetool > > would do what you want. > > -Peff > Thanks that sounds like what I want. I've also been a bit lazy and didn't run 'make install-doc' when I upgraded to 1.7.5.4 so my system man pages (1.7.0.4) don't mention rerere forget but it's there in rerere -h. Perhaps checkout --merge <path> should automagically tell rerere to forget about the path? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Redoing a merge for a particular file 2011-07-07 23:31 ` Chris Packham @ 2011-07-08 0:37 ` Junio C Hamano 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-07-08 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Packham; +Cc: Jeff King, GIT Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> writes: > Perhaps checkout --merge <path> should automagically tell rerere to > forget about the path? NOOOOOOOO. Please don't. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Redoing a merge for a particular file 2011-07-07 22:24 Redoing a merge for a particular file Chris Packham 2011-07-07 22:41 ` Jeff King @ 2011-07-08 0:36 ` Junio C Hamano 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Junio C Hamano @ 2011-07-08 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chris Packham; +Cc: GIT Chris Packham <judge.packham@gmail.com> writes: > $ git merge topic > Auto-merging foo.c > CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in foo.c > Auto-merging bar.c > CONFLICT (content): bar.c > Auto-merging otherfile1.c > Auto-merging otherfile2.c > Auto-merging otherfile3.c > Resolved 'foo.c' using previous resolution. > Resolved 'bar.c' using previous resolution. > Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result. > $ git mergetool > No files need merging > > So rerere has remembered the bad resolution of foo.c. I would do this: $ git rerere forget foo.c $ git checkout -m foo.c then fix it up and $ git add foo.c $ git commit ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-08 0:37 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2011-07-07 22:24 Redoing a merge for a particular file Chris Packham 2011-07-07 22:41 ` Jeff King 2011-07-07 23:31 ` Chris Packham 2011-07-08 0:37 ` Junio C Hamano 2011-07-08 0:36 ` Junio C Hamano
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).