From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: imap.preformattedHTML and imap.sslverify Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:05:27 -0800 Message-ID: <7vaavj8h1k.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v7hqqxj10.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4B7090C7.4040700@codeweavers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Robert Shearman To: Jeremy White X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 09 00:05:54 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Necfm-0001id-Mc for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:05:43 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750859Ab0BHXFh (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:05:37 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:49717 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750810Ab0BHXFh (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:05:37 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBFD9823B; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:05:36 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=DkFOvxTgQHsKPB9nwb2TiSIgXg0=; b=NaHnAd GdCj1BQTX1VRix23QEK4LIl2dJMl8HFQgDRoMcr7Srsq6qo4tfxY63WVJgMXDjDm JGpaO8FJOQ6PzcgVEbGvdFX8BuN0ZMSdeEiV77aBFXjVBMbyrkMX9TznjskHZiab mQoUzt8RWr6aDeRtffk/cFyHy1U5LXIL0/GMo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=aVe6v1wMELVvn9/gdGqruh5/oOW29dTs fIY1GDtytV1VCzP2gT8RAIQPfFnREOU2KCuj9icjGuwbWZfsMr5D2Aez/9EeO901 GCknTLKoPG1H6uLwBmkcJ8w+02kRVGBF7l3QcqIs927YLX0EEHoDw//lDcMIvMVq jgX7nc3tzVA= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CB498238; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:05:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7F54598235; Mon, 8 Feb 2010 18:05:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4B7090C7.4040700@codeweavers.com> (Jeremy White's message of "Mon\, 08 Feb 2010 16\:31\:35 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 75A86DAA-1506-11DF-967C-6AF7ED7EF46B-77302942!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeremy White writes: > I did confirm that your patch does work. > > However, I assumed that my original patch was rejected. > I never realized that it had been applied. > > That clearly means that no one has ever used this option. Thanks. I didn't mean to witch-hunt (did I ever say "the originally submitted patches were untested"?), and I apologise if you took it that way. You were Cc'ed because as the origin of the patch you were likely to be using that feature. I just wanted to make sure that the problem I thought I saw was real, and wanted to make sure that I was not overlooking subtleties in the current code people who are using the feature are relying upon. Will apply to maint and merge upwards.