* signing tags: user.name assumed to be gpg uid?
@ 2009-12-29 20:36 Peter Vereshagin
2009-12-29 21:12 ` Junio C Hamano
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Vereshagin @ 2009-12-29 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Como esta, git?
I notice that after I init and config user.name and user.email the user.comment gets taken from ~/.gpg automatically. Is it a correct behaviour?
And, when I try
git tag v0.1 -s
I get :
===
gpg: skipped "Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org>": secret key not available
===
and this is because I need to config user.name with the gpg comment: when I
===
git config --global user.name "Peter Vereshagin (http://vereshagin.org)"
===
the git tag signs well. But is it a correct behaviour to need the comment as a user's name? On key editing the gpg makes difference between (N)ame and (C)omment by far.
73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871 5EA7 52AB 12F8 0CE1 4AAC A0E2 6627)
--
http://vereshagin.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: signing tags: user.name assumed to be gpg uid?
2009-12-29 20:36 signing tags: user.name assumed to be gpg uid? Peter Vereshagin
@ 2009-12-29 21:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-30 10:47 ` Peter Vereshagin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Junio C Hamano @ 2009-12-29 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Vereshagin; +Cc: git
Peter Vereshagin <peter@vereshagin.org> writes:
> I notice that after I init and config user.name and user.email the
> user.comment gets taken from ~/.gpg automatically.
What is "user.comment"?
> Is it a correct behaviour?
Yes, matching with user.name/user.email (actually committer information)
is often the most convenient thing to do.
You can use user.signingkey configuration to use a key that doesn't match
your name, too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: signing tags: user.name assumed to be gpg uid?
2009-12-29 21:12 ` Junio C Hamano
@ 2009-12-30 10:47 ` Peter Vereshagin
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Vereshagin @ 2009-12-30 10:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Junio C Hamano; +Cc: git
Oh Junio want you buy me a mersedes benz?
2009/12/29 13:12:05 -0800 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> => To Peter Vereshagin :
JCH> > I notice that after I init and config user.name and user.email the
JCH> > user.comment gets taken from ~/.gpg automatically.
JCH> What is "user.comment"?
My probable suggestion about where the gpg key's comment field should be written for config --global. Sorry, it's not from ~/.gnupg
JCH> > Is it a correct behaviour?
JCH> Yes, matching with user.name/user.email (actually committer information)
JCH> is often the most convenient thing to do.
Is it necessary the pgp comment field to be present on the user.name? It isn't for From: in e-mail messages.
JCH> You can use user.signingkey configuration to use a key that doesn't match
JCH> your name, too.
Thanks!
73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871 5EA7 52AB 12F8 0CE1 4AAC A0E2 6627)
--
http://vereshagin.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-30 10:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-29 20:36 signing tags: user.name assumed to be gpg uid? Peter Vereshagin
2009-12-29 21:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-12-30 10:47 ` Peter Vereshagin
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).