From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git sequencer prototype Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 01:51:44 -0700 Message-ID: <7vabh2oulb.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1214879914-17866-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin To: Stephan Beyer X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 01 10:52:57 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KDbbX-000238-M1 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:52:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753569AbYGAIvx (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:51:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752895AbYGAIvw (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:51:52 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:37507 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752190AbYGAIvw (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:51:52 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49B21D55E; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:51:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04DEA1D55D; Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:51:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1214879914-17866-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> (Stephan Beyer's message of "Tue, 1 Jul 2008 04:38:30 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F22E803E-474A-11DD-8409-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Stephan Beyer writes: > I'm using sequencer-based git-am and git-rebase-i and also git-sequencer > itself for around 2-3 weeks now. So, for me, it is reality-proven, but > I'm curious about your opinions/suggestions in usage and source. Thanks. > The migration patches are a little hard to code-review in the diff-form, > but feel free to apply, test, and then look at the code ;) Heh, these three typically come in different order. Look at the log message and docs to see if the design is sound, then look at the code, and if things overall look Ok, then finally apply and test. I unfortunately ran out of time tonight and will look at them probably Thursday evening. It seems that another GSoC topic is finally nearing completion and I can shift my attention to other topics now. By the way Christian is not CC'ed?