From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Intricacies of submodules Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 13:44:33 -0700 Message-ID: <7vabjsnrda.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <47F15094.5050808@et.gatech.edu> <46dff0320804110904w531035f4w79c1889bc90c09ee@mail.gmail.com> <7vmyo0owep.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1207970038.10408.8.camel@ginkgo> <7vlk3jlkrr.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1208202740.25663.69.camel@work.sfbay.sun.com> <7vd4or7wdt.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1208317795.26863.91.camel@goose.sun.com> <87lk3c4ali.fsf@jeremyms.com> <1208461808.26863.129.camel@goose.sun.com> <46a038f90804171306t22491685p87d7445d44f00879@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Roman V. Shaposhnik" , "Jeremy Maitin-Shepard" , "Junio C Hamano" , "Ping Yin" , "Avery Pennarun" , stuart.freeman@et.gatech.edu, git@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin Langhoff" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 17 23:02:07 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JmazG-0005WD-06 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:45:42 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753363AbYDQUox (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:44:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753291AbYDQUox (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:44:53 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:54035 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175AbYDQUox (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:44:53 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5783E90; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:44:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1BB3E8F; Thu, 17 Apr 2008 16:44:40 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <46a038f90804171306t22491685p87d7445d44f00879@mail.gmail.com> (Martin Langhoff's message of "Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:06:27 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Martin Langhoff" writes: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:50 PM, Roman V. Shaposhnik wrote: >> There are two things at play: first of all, I usually *do* trust the >> content of the repository. Call it matter of personal preference, > > I think most people here split the trust into "before or after > compilation". I must trust that I can clone/checkout code safely so I > can review it. I think that summarizes the arguments so far pretty well. Having said that, the current "clone" implementation may happen to ignore in-tree anything, e.g. ident filter defined in .gitattributes may not be applied due to chicken-and-egg issue of not having .gitattributes initially in the work tree when you check everything out to an empty work tree for the first time. But I consider that is not by design, but is a limitation of the current implementation that can be improved.