git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Permit refspec source side to parse as a sha1
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:50:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vabksu1ct.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7v4pb0vhrg.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:10:59 -0700")

Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:

> I really think we cannot afford piling hacks on top of hacks to hide the
> broken interface forever.  We have two different things to validate, and
> the callers all know what they have when calling us to validate.  We
> should not have a single loose validation that only catches "it cannot be
> either fetch nor push refspec" breakage.
> ...
> But at least I think something like this patch would lead us in the right
> direction.

On top of the one I sent out, with this patch, you can:

	$ git push other ':/remote show:refs/heads/new'

to send the commit you would review with "git show ':/remote show'".

---
 builtin-send-pack.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin-send-pack.c b/builtin-send-pack.c
index 930e0fb..bb9c33a 100644
--- a/builtin-send-pack.c
+++ b/builtin-send-pack.c
@@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ static void verify_remote_names(int nr_heads, const char **heads)
 	int i;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nr_heads; i++) {
-		const char *remote = strchr(heads[i], ':');
+		const char *remote = strrchr(heads[i], ':');
 
 		remote = remote ? (remote + 1) : heads[i];
 		switch (check_ref_format(remote)) {

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-21  4:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-21  0:54 [PATCH] Permit refspec source side to parse as a sha1 Daniel Barkalow
2008-03-21  4:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-21  4:50   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-03-21  5:09   ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-03-21  5:30     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-21  5:57       ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-03-21  6:26         ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-21 16:08           ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-03-21 22:17             ` [PATCH] remote.c: Fix overtight refspec validation Junio C Hamano
2008-03-21 23:12               ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-03-21 23:59                 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-22  0:36                   ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-03-22 19:48                     ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-22 20:45                       ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-03-26  1:45               ` Linus Torvalds
2008-03-26  3:31                 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-26  4:11                   ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-26  5:42                     ` Daniel Barkalow
2008-03-26  5:46                       ` Junio C Hamano
2008-03-26  6:22                         ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vabksu1ct.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=barkalow@iabervon.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sam@rfc1149.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).