Re: fetch <repo> <branch>:<branch> fetches tags?

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Brandon Casey <drafnel@gmail.com> writes:

>> Having said that, I do not particularly think the new behaviour
>> is bad per-se.  If you are storing what you fetched locally in
>> tracking branches, you are interested in their work enough to
>> want to auto-follow their tags.
>
> How is "tracking" defined? Is this a term that implies some configuration
> to link a local branch to a remote branch? Or is any local branch created
> from a remote branch considered "tracking"?

I probably should have said "Instead of just letting fetch
temporarily store the result in FETCH_HEAD and using it from
there, you saved it away; that's a good indication of you care
about it deeply enough".

It's really about what's convenient.  I was somewhat upset that
the behaviour change was not I was very aware of (perhaps I said
it was a good idea and I then forgot), I didn't think the
earlier behaviour was broken, but if I have to choose, I think
the new behaviour is probably slightly nicer than the old one.