From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: config: add 'help.*' and 'instaweb.*' variables. Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:40:57 -0800 Message-ID: <7vabngwyra.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080108045514.1a506761.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <7vmyrgx26h.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <200801080843.35693.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Couder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jan 08 08:41:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JC95f-000399-Ev for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2008 08:41:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751989AbYAHHlN (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:41:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750716AbYAHHlN (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:41:13 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:37940 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750707AbYAHHlM (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:41:12 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A422F3834; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:41:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 612273831; Tue, 8 Jan 2008 02:41:06 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200801080843.35693.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (Christian Couder's message of "Tue, 8 Jan 2008 08:43:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Christian Couder writes: > By the way I had no comment on my RFC/Patch to run the test scripts under > valgrind. Maybe it's useless because it doesn't find any bug right now. I found it interesting myself. I did not know how well it fits into the rest of the testing infrastructure, though. Perhaps you would want to reopen the issue after 1.5.4?