From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use /etc/mailname for the hostname part of the email address. Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 23:07:42 -0700 Message-ID: <7vabu8d9w1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <11837748652889-git-send-email-kraai@ftbfs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matt Kraai , git@vger.kernel.org, Matt Kraai To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jul 07 08:07:56 2007 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I73SV-0001B7-19 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 08:07:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751390AbXGGGHp (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:07:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751735AbXGGGHo (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:07:44 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:41551 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751009AbXGGGHo (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:07:44 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070707060743.VQRK11062.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:07:43 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id LW7i1X00X1kojtg0000000; Sat, 07 Jul 2007 02:07:43 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Fri, 6 Jul 2007 19:54:34 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > The thing is, I actually personally tend to _prefer_ the committer name as > being "user@hostname" rather than a "real" email address. > > It often tells you something much more. I remember you said exactly the same thing before. But I wonder if "committer" e-mail address is really the place you would want to use as (one of) the source of reliable information for that kind of thing. The information obviously can be used among people who exchange commits via git-pull, but what about people whose changes are always fed as e-mailed patches? For such people, if they would want to encode the auxiliary information in their author name like you do with g5 and woody, would you recommend they put the in-body From: header, which may not be working e-mail addresses to reach them?