From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: should git download missing objects? Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:22:13 -0800 Message-ID: <7vac2v6qru.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vwt60bggs.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061113194532.GA4547@steel.home> <20061113195414.GD17244@spearce.org> <20061113200358.GF7201@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:22:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-Reply-To: <20061113200358.GF7201@pasky.or.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:03:58 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjiJz-0007qd-6g for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:22:23 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755261AbWKMUWQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:22:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755264AbWKMUWQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:22:16 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:40130 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755261AbWKMUWP (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:22:15 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061113202214.TIVL296.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:22:14 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id mLMo1V00C1kojtg0000000; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:21:49 -0500 To: Petr Baudis Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Petr Baudis writes: > ... Junio, what's its life > expectancy? I guess this usage scenario is something to take into > account when thinking about removing it, I know that I wanted to get rid > of it in the past but now my opinion is changing. It uses the same commit walker semantics and mechanism so I do not think it is too much burden to carry it, but I'd rather have something that works over git native protocol if we really care about this. People without ssh access needs to be able to recover over git:// protocol.