git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Cc: git list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:50:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vboh4tluo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347882637-21766-1-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org> (Adam Spiers's message of "Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:50:37 +0100")

Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> writes:

> 1. Change the color of individual known breakages from bold green to
>    bold yellow.  This seems more appropriate when considering the
>    universal traffic lights coloring scheme, where green conveys the
>    impression that everything's OK, and amber that something's not
>    quite right.
>
> 2. Likewise, change the color of the summarized total number of known
>    breakages from bold red to bold yellow to be less alarmist and more
>    consistent with the above.
>
> 3. Change color of unexpectedly fixed known breakages to bold red.  An
>    unexpectedly passing test indicates that the test is wrong or the
>    semantics of the code being tested have changed.  Either way this
>    is an error which is arguably as bad as a failing test, and as such
>    is now counted in the totals too.

I agree with Peff's comments.

The point #3 above wants to be a separate patch; we may even want to
consider a follow-up change to add an option to make a "test that is
expected to fail did not fail" case a failure.

>  test_known_broken_ok_ () {
>  	test_fixed=$(($test_fixed+1))
> -	say_color "" "ok $test_count - $@ # TODO known breakage"
> +	test_broken=$(($test_broken+1))
> +	say_color error "ok $test_count - $@ # TODO known breakage vanished"
>  }

Also I wonder if this is still a "TODO".  "# TODO fixed known breakage",
meaning that it is something that must be looked at by whoever happened
to have fixed the known breakage by accident, might be a better wording.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-09-17 20:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-17 11:50 [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive Adam Spiers
2012-09-17 20:11 ` Jeff King
2012-09-18 21:21   ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 20:02   ` Stefano Lattarini
2012-09-19 20:12     ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 20:13       ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 20:24         ` [PATCH v4 3/6] Color skipped tests blue Adam Spiers
2012-09-20  5:48           ` Johannes Sixt
2012-09-20  9:04             ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-20  9:08             ` [PATCH v5 3/3] Color skipped tests bold blue Adam Spiers
2012-09-20 10:08               ` Stefano Lattarini
2012-09-20 16:20                 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-09-21  6:13           ` [PATCH v4 3/6] Color skipped tests blue Jeff King
2012-11-11  2:04             ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-17 20:50 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2012-09-18 21:36   ` [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive Adam Spiers
2012-09-18 21:59     ` Jeff King
2012-09-18 22:14       ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15     ` [PATCH v2 0/6] make " Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Change the color of individual known breakages Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 2/6] Make 'not ok $count - $message' consistent with 'ok $count - $message' Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:50         ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 23:39         ` Junio C Hamano
2012-09-19 23:45           ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 3/6] Color skipped tests the same as informational messages Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:56         ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 18:44           ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49             ` [PATCH v3 " Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49               ` [PATCH v3 5/6] Test the test framework more thoroughly Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49               ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Treat unexpectedly fixed known breakages more seriously Adam Spiers
2012-09-20 21:13               ` [PATCH v3 4/6] Refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib Junio C Hamano
2012-09-19 19:37             ` [PATCH v2 " Jeff King
2012-09-19 20:15               ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Test the test framework more thoroughly Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15       ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Treat unexpectedly fixed known breakages more seriously Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:05       ` [PATCH v2 0/6] make test output coloring more intuitive Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vboh4tluo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@adamspiers.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).