From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org>
Cc: git list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:50:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vboh4tluo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1347882637-21766-1-git-send-email-git@adamspiers.org> (Adam Spiers's message of "Mon, 17 Sep 2012 12:50:37 +0100")
Adam Spiers <git@adamspiers.org> writes:
> 1. Change the color of individual known breakages from bold green to
> bold yellow. This seems more appropriate when considering the
> universal traffic lights coloring scheme, where green conveys the
> impression that everything's OK, and amber that something's not
> quite right.
>
> 2. Likewise, change the color of the summarized total number of known
> breakages from bold red to bold yellow to be less alarmist and more
> consistent with the above.
>
> 3. Change color of unexpectedly fixed known breakages to bold red. An
> unexpectedly passing test indicates that the test is wrong or the
> semantics of the code being tested have changed. Either way this
> is an error which is arguably as bad as a failing test, and as such
> is now counted in the totals too.
I agree with Peff's comments.
The point #3 above wants to be a separate patch; we may even want to
consider a follow-up change to add an option to make a "test that is
expected to fail did not fail" case a failure.
> test_known_broken_ok_ () {
> test_fixed=$(($test_fixed+1))
> - say_color "" "ok $test_count - $@ # TODO known breakage"
> + test_broken=$(($test_broken+1))
> + say_color error "ok $test_count - $@ # TODO known breakage vanished"
> }
Also I wonder if this is still a "TODO". "# TODO fixed known breakage",
meaning that it is something that must be looked at by whoever happened
to have fixed the known breakage by accident, might be a better wording.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-17 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-17 11:50 [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive Adam Spiers
2012-09-17 20:11 ` Jeff King
2012-09-18 21:21 ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 20:02 ` Stefano Lattarini
2012-09-19 20:12 ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 20:13 ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 20:24 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] Color skipped tests blue Adam Spiers
2012-09-20 5:48 ` Johannes Sixt
2012-09-20 9:04 ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-20 9:08 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] Color skipped tests bold blue Adam Spiers
2012-09-20 10:08 ` Stefano Lattarini
2012-09-20 16:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-09-21 6:13 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] Color skipped tests blue Jeff King
2012-11-11 2:04 ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-17 20:50 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2012-09-18 21:36 ` [PATCH] Make test output coloring more intuitive Adam Spiers
2012-09-18 21:59 ` Jeff King
2012-09-18 22:14 ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] make " Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] Change the color of individual known breakages Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] Make 'not ok $count - $message' consistent with 'ok $count - $message' Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:50 ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 23:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2012-09-19 23:45 ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] Color skipped tests the same as informational messages Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] Refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:56 ` Jeff King
2012-09-19 18:44 ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49 ` [PATCH v3 " Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] Test the test framework more thoroughly Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:49 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] Treat unexpectedly fixed known breakages more seriously Adam Spiers
2012-09-20 21:13 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] Refactor mechanics of testing in a sub test-lib Junio C Hamano
2012-09-19 19:37 ` [PATCH v2 " Jeff King
2012-09-19 20:15 ` Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] Test the test framework more thoroughly Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 17:15 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] Treat unexpectedly fixed known breakages more seriously Adam Spiers
2012-09-19 18:05 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] make test output coloring more intuitive Jeff King
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vboh4tluo.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@adamspiers.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).