From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] Documentation: git-send-email: correct statement about standard ports Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:19:32 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbpn0r9zf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1248995334-28545-1-git-send-email-wjl@icecavern.net> <1248995334-28545-2-git-send-email-wjl@icecavern.net> <7vzlaku9d4.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <200907311145.01759.wjl@icecavern.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: "Wesley J. Landaker" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 31 20:19:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MWwhp-0003Qm-L9 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:19:50 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752141AbZGaSTl (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:19:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751897AbZGaSTl (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:19:41 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:49453 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751300AbZGaSTk (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:19:40 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9474187E4; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:19:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B562D187E3; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:19:34 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200907311145.01759.wjl@icecavern.net> (Wesley J. Landaker's message of "Fri\, 31 Jul 2009 11\:45\:00 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B6227172-7DFE-11DE-9FCB-AEF1826986A2-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Wesley J. Landaker" writes: > On Friday 31 July 2009 10:04:39 Junio C Hamano wrote: >> As you noted, port 465 has been used as a well-known de-facto port to run >> SMTP over SSL at many places. I do not think it would help anybody by >> clarifying that it is a "non-standard" port here. This is not a place to >> educate people on which port they should run their SMTP servers. >> >> But I do not care deeply enough, and I can let it pass. >> >> I have much more trouble with that "like 465" than I have with "non >> standard". > > If you don't like the phrasing, how about this revised patch? I call it a > "common SSL smtp port", and refer directly to 465. I think should make everyone > happy: Looks really good. Thanks.