From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] git push usability improvements and default change Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 17:12:30 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbpsadymp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1236638151-6465-1-git-send-email-finnag@pvv.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Finn Arne Gangstad , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 10 01:14:36 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Lgpbl-0003wl-Jy for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:14:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753966AbZCJAMl (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:12:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753912AbZCJAMk (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:12:40 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:63186 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753893AbZCJAMk (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:12:40 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BB9A0CE0; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:12:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94DB3A0CDA; Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:12:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:35:12 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 291756D8-0D08-11DE-8386-CFA5EBB1AA3C-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: >> git push default change: >> >> git push will by default push "nothing" instead of "matching". > > Hasn't this been shot down already? I do not want that change. I think > it is harmful. > > At least without a proper way to prepare existing users for the end of the > world. I haven't actually read the patch, but my reading of the cover lette ris that the four-patch sequence 4-to-7 is (meant to be, at least) structured that way.