From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/2] git submodule: normalize paths before adding Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 08:32:02 -0800 Message-ID: <7vbpsid0u5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <49AD3A29.10404@drmicha.warpmail.net> <1236092901-28500-1-git-send-email-git@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Sixt , Andrei Thorp To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 03 17:33:54 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LeXYt-0007Xb-Ht for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2009 17:33:44 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756366AbZCCQcP (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:32:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756250AbZCCQcO (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:32:14 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:58308 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756126AbZCCQcN (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:32:13 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DC49E930; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:32:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31C529E92D; Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:32:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1236092901-28500-1-git-send-email-git@drmicha.warpmail.net> (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:08:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D7A167EA-0810-11DE-8DA9-CFA5EBB1AA3C-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael J Gruber writes: > This is a rewrite taking into account the advice given by Junio and J6t. > In particular, the tests are good citizens w.r.t. cd'ing around now, the > sed expressions work at least on AIX 4.3.3, and iterations of .. are > tested for and handled correctly. > > Sorry I didn't get around to finishing this earlier. Hope this doesn't > mess up any schedules. No worries. Other than obvious documentation fixes, anything sent after -rc0 will not hit 'master' unless it is a fix, and after -rc1 nothing will hit 'master' unless it is a regression fix. Even if some future version of your patch is queued to 'pu' or 'next, it won't affect the schedule for 1.6.2. Traditionally, those patches that are irrelevant to the upcoming release during the -rc period have been discussed on the list and then discarded, with a request to be resubmit after the release. Even though I have been queuing them to 'pu' or 'next' as an experiment during this cycle, it has not changed that during the -rc period, any new topic will not disrupt the upcoming release.