From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid using non-portable `echo -n` in tests. Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 13:10:06 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbpx08r1d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <200810312050.31167.fg@one2team.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Git List To: Francis Galiegue X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 31 21:11:37 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kw0LG-0002rI-I6 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:11:35 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751597AbYJaUKU (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:10:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751244AbYJaUKU (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:10:20 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:57371 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751174AbYJaUKT (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:10:19 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1FF477429; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:10:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17C1A77425; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 16:10:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200810312050.31167.fg@one2team.net> (Francis Galiegue's message of "Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:50:31 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F0823378-A787-11DD-9E0F-9CEDC82D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Francis Galiegue writes: > Unless I'm mistaken (and I probably am), the $(...) construct is > bash-specific, isn't it? You are.