From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: setlocalversion wasn't producing git labels for bisect
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:07:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vbpzagtb7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48B9A2C7.3080001@dgreaves.com> (David Greaves's message of "Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:43:03 +0100")
David Greaves <david@dgreaves.com> writes:
> Running
> git name-rev --tags HEAD
> gives the output
> HEAD tags/v2.6.27-rc4~44^2
>
> This isn't matched by setlocalversion regexp so it makes it harder to make deb-pkg/install/grub/reboot/remove
>
> Of course if this patch is accepted it is going to make life complicated when bisecting around it.
> Maybe git should behave as the man page suggests and have the ^X before the ~nnn? (maybe it has been fixed already)
Sorry, I don't understand what you are trying to fix here.
Your head can be reached by going 44 generations back (following the first
parent chain) from v2.6.27-rc4, which is a merge commit, and then taking
its second parent. IOW the name-rev output you quoted represents this
history:
v2.6.27-rc4
----o---o---o---....---o---o
/^ ^
/ v2.6.27-rc4~44 v2.6.27-rc4~1
o
^ Your HEAD
Swapping ^X and ~nnn changes the meaning completely. v2.6.27-rc4^2~44 is
the 44 generation ancestor of the second parent of -rc4, but v2.6.27-rc4
is *NOT* a merge and it does not have the second parent.
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/v1.5.6.5/git-name-rev.html
> shows an example:
> 33db5f4d9027a10e477ccf054b2c1ab94f74c85a tags/v0.99^0~940
This says
v0.99 is a tag, and dereference it (^0) to get to the commit that
points at it, and then the commit in question (33db5f) is its 940th
generation ancestor.
We used to explicitly say "it is a tag and dereference it" by adding ^0
but since Feb 2007 we stopped doing so because taking its 940th parent
can only be done to a commit, so v0.99~940 and v0.99^0~940 are equivalent.
We should fix the documentation, though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-30 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-30 19:43 setlocalversion wasn't producing git labels for bisect David Greaves
2008-08-30 20:07 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-08-30 20:11 ` [PATCH] Fix example in git-name-rev documentation Junio C Hamano
2008-09-01 11:07 ` Johannes Schindelin
2008-08-31 10:15 ` [Regression] Re: setlocalversion wasn't producing git labels for bisect David Greaves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vbpzagtb7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=david@dgreaves.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).