From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git merge --squash isn't "marked as a merge"?? Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 01:53:55 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbq0hhxzw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <488ECB89.5060801@sneakemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 29 10:55:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KNkz4-0004A4-Cc for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 10:55:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754106AbYG2IyG convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:54:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754064AbYG2IyE (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:54:04 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:46574 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754035AbYG2IyE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:54:04 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BA740D64; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:54:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CFFB40D62; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 04:53:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <488ECB89.5060801@sneakemail.com> (Peter Valdemar =?utf-8?Q?M?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=B8rch's?= message of "Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:49:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E31B5F6A-5D4B-11DD-B899-3113EBD4C077-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Peter Valdemar M=C3=B8rch (Lists)" <4ux6as402@sneakemail.com> writes: > Newbie alert: > > I have a feature branch where I have N tiny commits with sloppy/priva= te > commit messages.... Probably you would want to step back and _think_ why you want to squash= in the first place. I suspect the answer would lead to a better use of th= e available set of tools, such as "use 'rebase -i' to clean up the origin= al history and then 'merge' (without squash) it or 'rebase' it".