From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Is my repository broken? Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 23:50:20 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbq4jcyj7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080408225522.GD10274@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Shawn O. Pearce" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Julian Phillips X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 09 08:51:36 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JjU9Y-0002PH-Ty for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 09 Apr 2008 08:51:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750926AbYDIGug (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:50:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751178AbYDIGug (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:50:36 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:48937 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750882AbYDIGuf (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:50:35 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 616B8135F4; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:50:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27CE135F1; Wed, 9 Apr 2008 02:50:29 -0400 (EDT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Julian Phillips writes: > On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > >> The same holds true for the empty ident. > > Ok - but I can't even find a note in the manpage for this one ... That's not a fair complaint. It is often very hard to document that "we do not do X", because the line to stop at becomes fuzzier as you try to do more thorough job. We do not warn on empty ident, we do not warn on typos in commit log messages, we do not warn on empty blob, we do not warn on ... You get the idea.