From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] help: use parseopt Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 23:16:30 -0800 Message-ID: <7vbq65o69d.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080224221655.GB31309@coredump.intra.peff.net> <200802250750.53047.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20080225065710.GA3765@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christian Couder , Johannes Schindelin , Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 25 08:17:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JTXaj-0000St-9U for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:17:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752252AbYBYHQy (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:16:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752217AbYBYHQx (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:16:53 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:34365 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752168AbYBYHQx (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:16:53 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58285122A; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:16:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097F31228; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 02:16:40 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080225065710.GA3765@coredump.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Mon, 25 Feb 2008 01:57:10 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 07:50:52AM +0100, Christian Couder wrote: > >> > Sorry, the diff turned out quite messy because of the cleanups. It's >> > probably easier to just read the result. >> >> Or could you send the cleanups in some separated patches ? > > Looking at it again, it's actually not too bad except for the cmd_help() > function itself, which isn't due to the cleanups at all, but because the > flow changes quite a bit. So I don't think splitting it actually will > make the diff any friendlier. Your patch is fine as-is.