From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove "nohup" from git-help--browse Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 18:02:24 -0800 Message-ID: <7vbq6p7emn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vhcgkm7yy.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <1202502982-6822-1-git-send-email-dpotapov@gmail.com> <200802090653.43280.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <20080209200351.GC30368@dpotapov.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christian Couder , Git Mailing List , Johannes Schindelin To: Dmitry Potapov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 10 03:03:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JO1XS-0006Xf-In for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:03:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751660AbYBJCCl (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:02:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751705AbYBJCCk (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:02:40 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:47118 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751637AbYBJCCk (ORCPT ); Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:02:40 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B781225F; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:02:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8816225C; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 21:02:31 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080209200351.GC30368@dpotapov.dyndns.org> (Dmitry Potapov's message of "Sat, 9 Feb 2008 23:03:51 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Dmitry Potapov writes: > So, I want to hear what other people think. If there is no objection, > I will add this redirection. I personally feel that we should not hide output from the backend browsers by redirection. Some may be chattier than others, but then we would know against which browser to file bug reports. Just my two yen.