git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Cc: gitster@pobox.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Change git_connect() to return a struct child_process instead of a pid_t.
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:43:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vbqbjg9zz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1191183001-5368-2-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at

Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at> writes:

> This prepares the API of git_connect() and finish_connect() to operate on
> a struct child_process. Currently, we just use that object as a placeholder
> for the pid that we used to return. A follow-up patch will change the
> implementation of git_connect() and finish_connect() to make full use
> of the object.

Good description, except removal of checks for negative return
of the calling sites raised my eyebrow and had me spend a few
more minutes to review than necessary (see below).

> diff --git a/builtin-archive.c b/builtin-archive.c
> index 04385de..76db6cf 100644
> --- a/builtin-archive.c
> +++ b/builtin-archive.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int run_remote_archiver(const char *remote, int argc,
>  {
>  	char *url, buf[LARGE_PACKET_MAX];
>  	int fd[2], i, len, rv;
> -	pid_t pid;
> +	struct child_process *chld;

Is "child" a reserved keyword or something that we need to avoid
its use as an identifier?

>  	const char *exec = "git-upload-archive";
>  	int exec_at = 0;
>  
> @@ -46,9 +46,7 @@ static int run_remote_archiver(const char *remote, int argc,
>  	}
>  
>  	url = xstrdup(remote);
> -	pid = git_connect(fd, url, exec, 0);
> -	if (pid < 0)
> -		return pid;
> +	chld = git_connect(fd, url, exec, 0);
>  

Interesting.  This and other callers of git_connect() were
prepared to see git_connect() to report errors with negative PID
but the callee simply died --- so this change is not regressing
by removing an early error return.  It would be better to have
something like this in the commit log message:

	Old code had early-return-on-error checks at the calling
	sites of git_connect(), but the callee simply died on
	errors without returning negative values.  This patch
	removes such bogosity.

> diff --git a/connect.c b/connect.c
> index 3d5c4ab..f6dcab9 100644
> --- a/connect.c
> +++ b/connect.c
> @@ -468,21 +468,22 @@ char *get_port(char *host)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - * This returns 0 if the transport protocol does not need fork(2),
> + * This returns NULL if the transport protocol does not need fork(2),
>   * or a process id if it does.  Once done, finish the connection

It does not return a process ID anymore, so this comment needs
to be updated.  Instead, you now return a struct child_process
that is newly allocated, and needs to be deallocated somehow.
At the end of finish_connect() might be a good place to do so.

>   * with finish_connect() with the value returned from this function
> - * (it is safe to call finish_connect() with 0 to support the former
> + * (it is safe to call finish_connect() with NULL to support the former
>   * case).
>   *
> - * Does not return a negative value on error; it just dies.
> + * If it returns, the connect is successful; it just dies on errors.
>   */
> -pid_t git_connect(int fd[2], char *url, const char *prog, int flags)
> +struct child_process *git_connect(int fd[2], char *url,
> +				  const char *prog, int flags)
>  {
> ...
> -int finish_connect(pid_t pid)
> +int finish_connect(struct child_process *chld)
>  {
> -	if (pid == 0)
> +	if (chld == NULL)
>  		return 0;
>  
> -	while (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) < 0) {
> +	while (waitpid(chld->pid, NULL, 0) < 0) {
>  		if (errno != EINTR)
>  			return -1;
>  	}

But it seems you don't, leaking the struct.  I see this is fixed
in the next patch in the series, but it would be nicer to have
the free from the very beginning.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-30 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-30 20:09 [PATCH 0/5] fork/exec removal series Johannes Sixt
2007-09-30 20:09 ` [PATCH 1/5] Change git_connect() to return a struct child_process instead of a pid_t Johannes Sixt
2007-09-30 20:09   ` [PATCH 2/5] Use start_command() in git_connect() instead of explicit fork/exec Johannes Sixt
2007-09-30 20:09     ` [PATCH 3/5] Use start_command() to run the filter " Johannes Sixt
2007-09-30 20:10       ` [PATCH 4/5] Use run_command() to spawn external diff programs instead of fork/exec Johannes Sixt
2007-09-30 20:10         ` [PATCH 5/5] Use start_comand() in builtin-fetch-pack.c instead of explicit fork/exec Johannes Sixt
2007-09-30 21:10         ` [PATCH 4/5] Use run_command() to spawn external diff programs instead of fork/exec Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-30 21:07       ` [PATCH 3/5] Use start_command() to run the filter instead of explicit fork/exec Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-30 20:43   ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2007-09-30 21:40     ` [PATCH 1/5] Change git_connect() to return a struct child_process instead of a pid_t Johannes Sixt
2007-10-03 20:09       ` [PATCH 0/5, resend] fork/exec removal series Johannes Sixt
2007-10-03 20:09         ` [PATCH 1/5] Change git_connect() to return a struct child_process instead of a pid_t Johannes Sixt
2007-10-03 20:09           ` [PATCH 2/5] Use start_command() in git_connect() instead of explicit fork/exec Johannes Sixt
2007-10-03 20:09             ` [PATCH 3/5] Use start_command() to run the filter " Johannes Sixt
2007-10-03 20:09               ` [PATCH 4/5] Use run_command() to spawn external diff programs instead of fork/exec Johannes Sixt
2007-10-03 20:09                 ` [PATCH 5/5] Use start_comand() in builtin-fetch-pack.c instead of explicit fork/exec Johannes Sixt
2007-10-04  8:55                   ` Junio C Hamano
2007-10-04  9:22                     ` Johannes Sixt
2007-10-04 20:11                       ` Johannes Sixt
2007-10-01  7:23     ` [PATCH 1/5] Change git_connect() to return a struct child_process instead of a pid_t Johannes Sixt
2007-10-01  8:39       ` Junio C Hamano
2007-10-01  9:08         ` Johannes Sixt
2007-10-02 17:54           ` Junio C Hamano
2007-09-30 21:04   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-30 20:20 ` [PATCH 0/5] fork/exec removal series Junio C Hamano
2007-09-30 21:14 ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-09-30 21:34   ` Johannes Sixt
2007-09-30 21:43     ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-10-01  7:07       ` Johannes Sixt
2007-10-01  9:49         ` David Kastrup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vbqbjg9zz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=johannes.sixt@telecom.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).