From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Accept dates before 2000/01/01 when specified as seconds since the epoch Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 22:29:17 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbqfsqqmq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <11811175153355-git-send-email-johannes.sixt@telecom.at> <7vtztl5vvb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <46679320.6000309@vilain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Sixt , git@vger.kernel.org To: Sam Vilain X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 07 07:29:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HwAYp-0003Np-Mc for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 07:29:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756375AbXFGF3U (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 01:29:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756423AbXFGF3U (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 01:29:20 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.241.45]:40367 "EHLO fed1rmmtao101.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754404AbXFGF3S (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jun 2007 01:29:18 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070607052919.WCJP7825.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 01:29:19 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id 8VVH1X00C1kojtg0000000; Thu, 07 Jun 2007 01:29:18 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46679320.6000309@vilain.net> (Sam Vilain's message of "Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:09:52 +1200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Sam Vilain writes: >> Perhaps >> >> "epoch" [-+] [0-9]+ " " [-+][0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9] > > Probably a good idea, though it would break cg-admin-rewritehist. I was saying "additionally allow that to express timestamp even before the epoch", and existing cg-admin-rewritehist does not feed such a string, so I do not know how the additionally allowed format could break it. Maybe I am missing something? In any case, "timestamps after March 1973" patch from j6t is a good change independent from the above one.