From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git 1.5.1-rc1 doesn't like empty files Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 01:49:51 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbqio7100.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <1174361424.3143.42.camel@dv> <1174367312.3143.75.camel@dv> <200703200843.51473.andyparkins@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Pavel Roskin , Alexander Litvinov To: Andy Parkins X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Mar 20 09:50:16 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HTa2n-0001Xn-6q for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:50:13 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753539AbXCTItw (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:49:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753299AbXCTItw (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:49:52 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net ([68.230.241.45]:40880 "EHLO fed1rmmtao101.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752579AbXCTItw (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:49:52 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070320084951.MPFK748.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:49:51 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id cwpr1W0021kojtg0000000; Tue, 20 Mar 2007 04:49:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200703200843.51473.andyparkins@gmail.com> (Andy Parkins's message of "Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:43:50 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andy Parkins writes: > On Tuesday 2007 March 20 05:41, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> [core] >> legacyheaders = false >> noticed, because almost nobody uses it. > > I'm not sure that's going to be true for long - the 1.5.0 release notes > recommended setting it (assuming you didn't need backward compatibility) - > which is exactly what I (and I'm sure others) did. Well, it is fixed in 'master' to be in -rc2, and that validation does not exist in 'maint', so no harm is done.