From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Lose perl dependency. (fwd) Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 17:21:00 -0800 Message-ID: <7vbqkubiir.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <45AF5F83.6090207@fs.ei.tum.de> <7vps9ag58g.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vvej2bkn2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 20 02:21:09 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H84up-0001mz-MP for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:21:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965099AbXATBVE (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:21:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965108AbXATBVE (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:21:04 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:43890 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965099AbXATBVB (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:21:01 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070120012101.IMCY2628.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:21:01 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id DDMJ1W00J1kojtg0000000; Fri, 19 Jan 2007 20:21:18 -0500 To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 20 Jan 2007 02:18:08 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > OTOH we can expect people _not_ to use --reverse with format-patch when > they don't know what it does! I mean, I don't go and use "ls" with an > option I saw in the man page, just because it has a cool ring to it. > > P.S.: Perhaps you should just stop worrying and learn to love --reverse I usually do not worry, especially while I am running 'next' myself. It's just unintended consequences I am worried about by touching somewhere deep in the revision machinery after -rc1.