From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gitweb: Cleanup Git logo and Git logo target generation Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 13:33:13 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbqomim46.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060919212725.GA13132@pasky.or.cz> <7vac4qs43g.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200610061231.06017.jnareb@gmail.com> <7vwt7aio8l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061008201031.GL20017@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Oct 08 22:33:21 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GWfKo-0005ru-3Z for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:33:18 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751389AbWJHUdP (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 16:33:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751390AbWJHUdP (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 16:33:15 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:54967 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751389AbWJHUdO (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 16:33:14 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061008203314.PBJ12581.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sun, 8 Oct 2006 16:33:14 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id XwZ51V00L1kojtg0000000 Sun, 08 Oct 2006 16:33:05 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20061008201031.GL20017@pasky.or.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Sun, 8 Oct 2006 22:10:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis writes: > Is there a problem with taking <200610061231.06017.jnareb@gmail.com>? > > I think it's currently not worth the complexity and breakage of > backwards compatibility to do the more elaborate form you proposed. I agree with that, except that the 72x27 dimension bit troubles me.