From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] gitweb: Make the Git logo link target to point to the homepage Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:34:42 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbqoqbg5p.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060919212725.GA13132@pasky.or.cz> <20060923125746.GJ8259@pasky.or.cz> <7virjes7dq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060923194643.GN13132@pasky.or.cz> <20061005204752.GL20017@pasky.or.cz> <7vhcyibgon.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 05 23:35:52 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVarz-0007sm-KH for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:35:07 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932229AbWJEVeu (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:34:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932232AbWJEVet (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:34:49 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:31470 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932229AbWJEVes (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:34:48 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061005213448.WKL13992.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 17:34:48 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Wlaq1V00Q1kojtg0000000 Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:34:50 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <7vhcyibgon.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:23:20 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Junio C Hamano writes: > Petr Baudis writes: > >>> > > Ping? This is the only gitweb patch still in my stg stack. I guess >>> > > noone really cares strongly either way since there were no comments. >>> > >>> > I did not care either way, but I did not like either of these >>> > hardcoded strings in the code, and felt that if we are touching >>> > that part of the code we also should be making real improvement >>> > at the same time ;-). >>> > >>> > Doing something like this would let us update it easier, and >>> > let people override with GITWEB_CONFIG if they want to. >>> >>> Reasonable. >>> >>> Acked-by: Petr Baudis >> >> So, what happenned to this patch? > > Did anybody send in an applicable patch? Ah, I found it; you do not have to re-send it. But do you still want it?