From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: Re: git vs git
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 11:22:03 -0800
Message-ID: <7vbqxt8qsk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
References: <d93f04c70601300714i4b7b3b58qa5aa151e3e42a413@mail.gmail.com>
	<20060130153715.GE30671@harddisk-recovery.com>
	<86acddirjr.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com>
	<20060130172344.GA20867@harddisk-recovery.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 30 20:22:30 2006
Return-path: <git-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org
Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1F3ebJ-0007T7-Vb
	for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:22:14 +0100
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932377AbWA3TWH (ORCPT <rfc822;gcvg-git@m.gmane.org>);
	Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:22:07 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932379AbWA3TWH
	(ORCPT <rfc822;git-outgoing>); Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:22:07 -0500
Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:24761 "EHLO
	fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S932377AbWA3TWF (ORCPT <rfc822;git@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:22:05 -0500
Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127])
          by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP
          id <20060130191902.BSYX20050.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>;
          Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:19:02 -0500
To: Erik Mouw <erik@harddisk-recovery.com>
In-Reply-To: <20060130172344.GA20867@harddisk-recovery.com> (Erik Mouw's
	message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:23:45 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/15290>

Erik Mouw <erik@harddisk-recovery.com> writes:

> Hey, I said "untested" :) But yeah, you're right. Your syntax is
> correct, every time I write such a wrapper I try to remember it...

I would tolerate if you say it apologetically, but let all of us
try to refrain from sending something marked *proudly* as
"untested".

That is a privilege reserved for only a few ;-)  Currently only
one -- Linus.