From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: gitweb: latest blob date (request) Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 09:55:12 -0800 Message-ID: <7vbqyct5vj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060115173100.1134256b.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <17355.10749.834774.642712@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20060115211011.17b18f60.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20060116174444.GA13512@vrfy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 16 18:55:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyYZb-00042C-T4 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:55:20 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750770AbWAPRzQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:55:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750778AbWAPRzP (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:55:15 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]:18827 "EHLO fed1rmmtao10.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750770AbWAPRzO (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:55:14 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060116175355.NTIX20441.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:53:55 -0500 To: Kay Sievers In-Reply-To: <20060116174444.GA13512@vrfy.org> (Kay Sievers's message of "Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:44:44 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Kay Sievers writes: > Hmm, where do I find this information? It is recorded in last commit, > that changed the file, right? I'm not sure, if we can get this out of > the git tools? Yes we can. But it is rather expensive. You would do an equivalent of "git whatchanged" for each and every path. Of course commit chain is immutable so you could do this once and cache the results.