From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Debian packaging for 0.99.4 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:12:17 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbr45ngse.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v8xzfde7t.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vr7d6z3pn.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vacjsdcbj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vwtmw5nx7.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <46a038f9050810155642bb5580@mail.gmail.com> <20050810233953.GV28270@kiste.smurf.noris.de> <46a038f90508102144358a4bcf@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sebastian Kuzminsky X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 11 08:12:59 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E36Ig-0000hz-Gx for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:12:22 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932239AbVHKGMU (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:12:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932274AbVHKGMU (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:12:20 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:12706 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932239AbVHKGMT (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:12:19 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050811061217.XQZZ19494.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:12:17 -0400 To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: (Sebastian Kuzminsky's message of "Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:01:26 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Sebastian Kuzminsky writes: > While we're at it, renaming cogito's "cg" to "cog" would fix another > filename conflict in Debian, and would give the right hand something to > do while the left hand seeks from c to g. ;-) Well, these days cogito ships without git, so maybe it should be renamed to "coo" ;-). No, renaming git to lit is not on my list of immediate things to do. At least not yet.