From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Git-commits mailing list feed. Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 13:24:55 -0700 Message-ID: <7vbr852qco.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <200504210422.j3L4Mo8L021495@hera.kernel.org> <42674724.90005@ppp0.net> <20050422002922.GB6829@kroah.com> <426A4669.7080500@ppp0.net> <1114266083.3419.40.camel@localhost.localdomain> <426A5BFC.1020507@ppp0.net> <1114266907.3419.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050423175422.GA7100@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <2911.10.10.10.24.1114279589.squirrel@linux1> <7vis2d2rmv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sean , Thomas Glanzmann , David Woodhouse , Jan Dittmer , Greg KH , Kernel Mailing List , Git Mailing List X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Apr 23 22:20:49 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPR71-0004tT-KL for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 22:20:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261782AbVDWUZC (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Apr 2005 16:25:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261776AbVDWUZC (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Apr 2005 16:25:02 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:19699 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261756AbVDWUY6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Apr 2005 16:24:58 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.60.172]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050423202457.WJMM12158.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sat, 23 Apr 2005 16:24:57 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: <7vis2d2rmv.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Sat, 23 Apr 2005 12:57:12 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "JCH" == I said: JCH> If that is the case, can't you do it without introducing this JCH> new tag object, like this? Of course It Would Not Work. I am an idiot X-<. Sorry. What I suggested does not authenticate the tag itself.