From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Off-line deverloper workflow? Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:17:59 -0700 Message-ID: <7vd2r7tquw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20130627124656.GA2620@zuhnb712> <51CC4197.3000007@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Woody Wu , git To: =?utf-8?Q?Jean-No=C3=ABl?= Avila X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 27 19:18:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UsFph-0004Zs-41 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 19:18:09 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752093Ab3F0RSF convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:18:05 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:57546 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751353Ab3F0RSD convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 13:18:03 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998F229EAB; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:18:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=kDG0rKREXjfG klGiB2bBjbwMvUQ=; b=CV/CMdBdEUdeyAobrLOLV1rtGMrAHttfa7FaUPmIy+Z3 d7oqJAP/tVGf34LRFTIk2AToDhvQxmSVbWzuDzTh8RuvsWtx/DT47dEufRYEb41L tK/T8JYUrp2IMhZpeNbXcSNUV2PIEVLyxVFhApVgskcBIZ5EkDRDiczswXjSkpI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=F76lJD bwsY03mlrVdG3SBWsvR3wGyFwYSNt7uHiK9rthepxHq5oXnoCuKdFQkD5EP1fcgo VJBxSUj0mZ6Z1xQgrfWh6GNq2zGrZuwGiYqajRxym9KXyrJYcY+iBmyAhjhgmj6p PocaBVw5ACe4skgTlEjW+5m7wpN1RrLxfvLrg= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DB029EAA; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:18:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [50.161.4.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9DB0A29EA7; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:18:01 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <51CC4197.3000007@gmail.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Jean-No=C3=ABl?= Avila"'s message of "Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:43:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 854EE594-DF4D-11E2-B651-E636B1368C5F-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jean-No=C3=ABl Avila writes: > For a short time, I had the same issue. We came up using "git bundle" > to bundle changes and exchange them via email. >=20 > The setup was to work in two separate branches. The roaming developpe= r > started a new branch when leaving. After some work, she sent the > commits on her branch as a bundle file. The origin merged the branch > extracted from the developper's bundle and sent back the bundle of th= e > changes on origin since the last merge. > > No doubt that both side need to understand well the workflow of > fetch/merge. Bundle files can be encrypted for better security. Yes, the above describes exactly what "bundle" was invented for.