From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jul 2009, #01; Mon, 06) Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:34:01 -0700 Message-ID: <7vd48djvae.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vk52l4q7k.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <200907062229.11763.mcamen@mcamen.de> <7vk52l1oht.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <200907070003.25788.mcamen@mcamen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Mark Lodato , git@vger.kernel.org To: Marcus Camen X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 07 00:34:17 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MNwlN-0001RM-9p for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:34:17 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753535AbZGFWeG (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:34:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753213AbZGFWeF (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:34:05 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:44149 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753193AbZGFWeE (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:34:04 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BC9252D6; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:34:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2EC7252D3; Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:34:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200907070003.25788.mcamen@mcamen.de> (Marcus Camen's message of "Tue\, 7 Jul 2009 00\:03\:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1D55E2A6-6A7D-11DE-AF7B-DC021A496417-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Marcus Camen writes: >> - On a protected key/cert, with configuration, it asks the question >> once. >> - On an unprotected key/cert, without configuration, it never asks the >> question. >> - On an unprotected key/cert, with configuration, it asks an useless >> question but it does so only once. >> >> You tested all of the above? > > Yes, all three tests run exactly as you described. Wonderful; thanks.