From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v1 1/1] +5 cases (4 fail), diff whitespace tests Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:47:02 -0800 Message-ID: <7vd4elys21.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Keith Cascio X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 18 08:49:02 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LOSOc-0006BM-Ql for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 08:48:39 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757931AbZARHrL (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:47:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758115AbZARHrJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:47:09 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:36800 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755773AbZARHrH (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:47:07 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D0791559; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:47:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA9A191557; Sun, 18 Jan 2009 02:47:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Keith Cascio's message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:48:24 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 34218A36-E534-11DD-8CCD-5720C92D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Keith Cascio writes: > +5 cases (4 fail), diff whitespace tests > There are 2^3 = eight possible combinations of the three flags: > -w -b --ignore-space-at-eol > Three of those combinations were already being tested: > [none] > -w > -b > Add tests of the other five combinations, Hmm. Are these three supposed to be orthogonal?