From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sort_in_topological_order(): avoid setting a commit flag Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:07:15 -0700 Message-ID: <7vd4l4b6gc.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7v7ibdifbp.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080723214942.GZ10151@machine.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: Petr Baudis X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jul 24 00:08:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KLmVW-0004tO-Kt for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:08:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753759AbYGWWH0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:07:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753713AbYGWWH0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:07:26 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:38532 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753759AbYGWWHZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:07:25 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E376D38011; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:07:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DA82F3800C; Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:07:17 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080723214942.GZ10151@machine.or.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:49:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B9DE55FE-5903-11DD-AA95-3113EBD4C077-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis writes: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 06:01:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Do people still actively use show-branch as a G/CUI, especially after that >> "log --graph" thing was introduced? > > To me, show-branch is just more convenient to use; I can see more easily > which patches are with which branches, which is useful especially for my > new sick-twisted use of feature branches for individual patches, thus > having a lot of interdependencies. Heh, I still recall hearing from many people that its output is hard to decipher and UI is unintuitive. What changed their mind, I have to wonder...