From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: man pages are littered with .ft C and others Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:28:28 -0800 Message-ID: <7vd4rci6vn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <200802031139.48752.jnareb@gmail.com> <20080204220120.GA23798@diku.dk> <200802050026.22262.jnareb@gmail.com> <20080205000048.GA28020@diku.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jakub Narebski , Adam Flott , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonas Fonseca X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 05 01:29:18 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JMBgb-0006GL-R2 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 01:29:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757521AbYBEA2p (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:28:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757503AbYBEA2p (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:28:45 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:51616 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757479AbYBEA2o (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:28:44 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057C22455; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:28:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C03C2454; Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:28:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20080205000048.GA28020@diku.dk> (Jonas Fonseca's message of "Tue, 5 Feb 2008 01:00:48 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonas Fonseca writes: > Jakub Narebski wrote Tue, Feb 05, 2008: > >> P.S. writing subset of AsciiDoc in Perl, which would write manpages, HTML >> and perhaps info/texinfo files directly, without fragile xmlto toolchain, >> looks better and better... > > But not as easy as just pulling the documentation branches. But your approach has a small flaw of chicken-and-egg problem ;-).