From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Be more careful about updating refs Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:29:54 -0800 Message-ID: <7vd4s2d33x.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jan 16 01:31:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JEwBJ-00041Q-OF for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:31:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751677AbYAPAaL (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:30:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751423AbYAPAaK (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:30:10 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:42332 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751134AbYAPAaJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:30:09 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AC52887; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:30:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDAEF2886; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:30:01 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:50:17 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds > --- > > I'm signing off on this, but I hope people will double-check this: I > didn't actually test it very much. Does "Signed-off-by:" line mean something different for you than for other people these days? I thought that the rule that applies to you (and only you) on this list was that all patches from you are DCO certified and I am free to forge your signature on them, and the other rule that applies to everybody including you is that Signed-off-by: is about DCO certification and not about anything else (e.g. author's confidence level about the patch). I am asking because you did not have S-o-b and did not say anything about the other patch about commit object creation. Although both patches looked sane to me.