From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] new test from the submodule chapter of the user manual Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 14:35:20 -0700 Message-ID: <7vd4wdkokn.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20070920003413.GJ16235@genesis.frugalware.org> <7v1wcum0ox.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20070920170831.GQ16235@genesis.frugalware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , "J. Bruce Fields" To: Miklos Vajna X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Sep 20 23:35:42 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IYTgR-0000Yp-34 for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 23:35:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753467AbXITVfd (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:35:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753411AbXITVfc (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:35:32 -0400 Received: from rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.210.124.37]:49671 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753101AbXITVfb (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:35:31 -0400 Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rune.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37FE138DB2; Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:35:47 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20070920170831.GQ16235@genesis.frugalware.org> (Miklos Vajna's message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2007 19:08:31 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Miklos Vajna writes: > Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna > --- > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:34:25AM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> > Looks Ok to me, although I didn't verify the examples by >> > actually running them myself this time (last round I did). >> >> So maybe we should do the same as with the tutorial: stick the examples >> into a test script? > > what about this? Far too inadequate. You test if "commit" reports success, but do not check if what is committed is what you wanted to commit, for example.